What About Bob?
a
film by Frank Oz released through
Touchstone's Buena Vista in 1991

When Bob Wiley finds hope in
a new psychiatrist, Dr. Leo Marvin, he refuses to accept the possibility of a
month sans his new-found source of wise counsel. Tracking down Dr. Marvin at his vacation
retreat in Lake Winnipesaukee, Bob is gradually welcomed into the family as Leo
finds himself on the outside looking in.
Soon, Bob is on television with Leo, the
doctor being interviewed about his new book. Leo cracks under pressure,
and Bob shines. Leo arranges for Bob to
be admitted to an asylum, but Bob is released and Leo's composure unravels when
Bob becomes friendly with Leo's visiting sister, Lilly.
Now Bob is in control of things and
Leo is the patient. Desperate to end the
farce, Leo kidnaps, and straps explosives to, an eager Bob, who interprets the
situation as just another intense therapy session. Bob is able to free himself and inadvertently
burns down Leo's immaculate vacation home in the process. In the epilogue, Leo recovers from his
psychiatric meltdown just in time to 'welcome' Bob to the family...as Lilly's
new husband.
Leo seems like he is a very good
psychiatrist. He gets to the root of a
problem quickly, and can make quick assessments. But he is arrogant, as evidenced by voicing
his praise for his new book in the third person and unnecessarily reminding the
grocery clerk that he would soon be on TV.
It is this arrogance that sets him up for the kill. The critical decision in all his trouble with
Bob was taking him on as a patient to begin with. A distressed colleague is able to unload his
most troublesome client, Bob Wiley, by playing on Leo's pride, making reference
to his new book and deferentially labeling him "brilliant."
Dismissing Bob as just another
patient after their first session, Bob is desperate for further assistance,
faking suicide and posing as an investigator to procure Dr. Marvin's
location.
Later, perturbed by Bob's tenacity
and finally realizing that getting rid of him was easier said than done, Leo
could have maintained his composure, but arrogance prevented him from embracing
the idea of Bob appearing on Good
Morning, America, an episode to stand as the impetus for Leo's descent into
imbecility. What is not clear is whether
Dr. Marvin would have been successful on camera even if Bob wasn't with
him. Leo could have made the best of the
situation and preserved his professional reputation while, unseen, his private
life was soured by the interloper Bob. At this point of the story his
frustration with Bob is easily understood, but the weight of blame shifts as
Leo commits Bob to an asylum.
The kids, Anna and Sigmund, keep
their father at arm's length for good reason, but he did have every right to
buy the house. The Guttmann's channel
their resentment over losing the sale right back at Dr. Marvin; they know Bob
irritates him, so they twice encourage Bob—first, conveying him to the house,
and then, offering a place to stay so he can continue to hound the panicking psychiatrist.
Naturally, Bob would be well-received
by the family, the first arbiters in this awkward doctor-patient
relationship. Bob is funny, he saves Leo
from choking, he gives Anna someone with whom to share her anxieties, and
brings moribund Ziggy out of his all-too-youthful flirtation with
depression. He complements Faye's beauty
and her cooking. But we're never sure if
Bob is really ignorant of the impact he is having. As he remarks in passing as we approach the
film's climax, he is becoming the daddy, superceding Leo, who is desperate to
reclaim his rightful place. But he can't
convince Faye, despite passionate entreaties.
When he "brushes" his teeth with his finger (his new
toothbrush ceded to Bob), he begs her to reassess the situation they find
themselves in, but to no avail; when he returns home without Bob later in the
film, Faye hauntingly cries, "What about Bob?!"
The most important confrontation
between the couple comes after the ingratiating Bob has been impulsively pushed
in the lake by Leo. As Bob scrubs away
in the outdoor shower, Leo asks Faye not to invite Bob to dinner. He is passionate, but previously he'd been
very cool about the family's new friend.
When Bob entered his house, uninvited, to retrieve Gill, Leo, reaching for
the fish, unseen by the others, bristled at this latest violation of privacy
and psychiatric protocol, this coming on the heels of Leo's insightful take on
Bob's persistent anxieties. When Bob
showed up at his house, Leo calmly took Bob on a stroll, advising him to
"take a vacation from [his] problems." He veiled his anger, having decided that by
staying calm he could better dispense the advice that would get Bob out of his
hair.
Leo says that he doesn't get
angry. Until Bob invaded his life, he was
able to bury the anger so none could see.
Thus, the analyst inadvertently receives treatment from the client.
So, here he is, devastated that his
family will not heed him and shun Bob.
Faye refuses to listen, saying, self-righteously, "Right is right." We see Bob, then, reacting to this exchange
with restrained delight. We don't know
if he is excited that Leo's moodiness was overcome or he recognizes Leo's
intransigence for the serious reluctance and disapproval it is...and he's more
than happy to stick it to him. As Bob
relates to Anna at an earlier juncture in the film, if he does not receive a
positive response from a person, he views that person as a telephone,
temporarily disconnected. Thus, in his
mind, with time, all people can be won over.
It is not choice, but circumstance that prevents him from interrelating.
Bob looks at all of Leo's increasing
hostility as unorthodox treatment that will prove as successful as Leo's
previous efforts. He really is, as Bob
predicts at the film's beginning, the first person who can help him. And since Leo gave his 'prescription' to
"take a vacation" while he, himself, was on vacation, Bob may figure
that Leo is willing to go on treating him there in New Hampshire, and that a
more radical methodology may be necessary to restore Bob to full mental
health. And when he's not being treated,
he will hang around just for fellowship.
He is so convinced of Leo's
brilliance that only death could convince him of otherwise for only then would
therapy be of no consequence. Leo may be
right, that Bob will never leave him alone, but this is no justification for
murder. A less immoral recourse would be
to frame Bob for an elaborate crime, appropriating the prison walls as a
suitable buffer. Again, Leo's anger, finally
unleashed, is appreciable, if not understandable. Bob promised to get his bus ticket to go back
to New York and to wait in the coffee shop.
Though the Guttmanns had other plans, Bob could have said, "No, I
made a vow and I intend to keep it—I respect him a lot more than your fruitless
grudge." Then, on the TV show, Bob,
unthinking, assuming, appropriated Leo's family as his own and took Leo's seat
next to the interviewer.
But this is heart warming: Book-ending the explosion, Leo is embraced by his family, for, despite his numerous
failings, he is their father and husband.
He came before Bob, and he will outlast him too. But the latter is an idle projection.
The strength of this film, probably
Frank Oz's best, lay in the antagonism between Bob and Leo, its humor finding
expression in Bob's wide-eyed inability to recognize Leo's displeasure. It's like The Odd Couple with Oscar thinking
he's just the same as Felix.
Home ----ILLUMINED---- Links ----ILLUSIONS---- Contact